PH awash with cash

This May, President Duterte has embarked on a four-country tour: his Cabinet members, a coterie of businessmen, and his HoneyLet and their youngest girl, in tow, to Cambodia, Hong Kong, China, and Russia.

Tourism aside, the trips have three ostensible purposes—to foster closer bilateral and multi-lateral relations, drum up foreign investments, and line up project financing, usually money of foreign governments disguised as official development assistance.

After nine months in office, Duterte has probably realized nothing concrete has happened on the economic front—in terms of economic reforms, new taxes approved, easier way of doing business (the local government units or LGUs are as corrupt as ever and they raise the cost of doing business), dramatic job generation, and even more dramatic poverty reduction.

Outside of Duterte’s controversial and high-profile war on drugs that has brought opprobrium for the Philippines for alleged human rights violations, and except for a sharp reduction in petty crime (although the police continue with their rackets and larceny), and a huge popular endorsement for the President (whose trust and job satisfaction ratings are in the high 70s)—little has happened for the man in the street to say his life is much better. 

It still takes at least two months to get an appointment to apply for a passport.   You apply today, you get an August date. You still cannot get your plastic driver’s license and the overpriced medical eye exam remains a sham.  You still cannot get your metal car plate. MRT3 still bogs down twice a day.  You still cannot get to your place of work in less than two hours of commute, one way.

True, the economy expanded by 6.9 percent in 2016, among the highest growth rates in Asia, and probably by 7 percent in the first quarter 2017.  But this robust growth is a credit primarily to the economy’s intrinsic strength and strong fundamentals than to any significant reform by the government or effort by the central bank.

It is not for lack of money that the government cannot institute drastic reforms and alleviate poverty.  This government and this country are awash with cash.  The economy is awash with cash.

Where is that money?  To start with, the savings rate is 30 percent of the value of output of goods and services or GDP.  GDP is P15 trillion.  So 30 percent of that is P4.5 trillion.   With that, we can finance the entire government’s operations for one year and still have P1 trillion of excess money.

We have $27 billion in annual OFW remittances. That’s P1.35 trillion.  It can finance the entire government infrastructure program in 2019.  The P1.35 trillion is 1.6x the infra budget of P847.2 billion this year. This P1.356 trillion is orphan money because nobody marshals it for productive purposes.  The P1.35 trillion thus is marooned inside elegant malls and in forests of condos where a square meter is overpriced at least five times its real value.

In addition, we earn $25 billion from our call centers and business process outsourcing (BPO).  That’s another P1.25 trillion.

Moreover, right at the central bank, private banks have parked P3 trillion of private deposits— money the banks are too lazy or too afraid to lend (because the BSP is a much better borrower and you talk to only one guy).  If the banks were to lend out the P3 trillion, they would have to employ entire bureaucracies—processing loan applications, interviewing loan applicants, visiting or assessing properties used as collateral, and holding so many meetings to approve the loans. 

I once tried to borrow P3 million.  I was interviewed by two teams of loan officers over coffee, with three people in each team from the same bank.  That’s six people.  They told me knowing your client (KYC) is required by the central bank.

So to release P3 trillion loans to individuals, the banks will have employ one million additional loan officers. Why bother then.  Go to the BSP, which is also too lazy or too afraid to pressure the banks to release the loans to the public.  Besides, there are no more than 5,000 Filipinos who make P5-million income a year and are thus qualified to borrow big-ticket loans.  And the banking system is owned by only five people.  That is what you call financial inclusion—for the very rich only.

Additionally, the Philippines has $81.8 billion in foreign reserves—money that can pay for importations for a year.  That’s another P4-trillion money.

So why do your bureaucrats keep courting credit rating agencies to get an investment grade credit rating?  We don’t need to borrow abroad.  We don’t even need foreign investments.

We have so much money locally.  So why does Duterte go around the world panhandling?  The Philippines is capital-surplus.  In fact, the country has been exporting capital, rather than importing, in the past 10 consecutive years.

Duterte has appointed a new central bank governor, Nestor Espenilla, 58.  He is an economist and a 36-year veteran at BSP. Our central bank is supposed to be among the world’s best. Outgoing BSP Governor Amando Tetangco Jr. has been cited world’s best no less than eight times.

So again I ask this:

If the Philippines is awash with so much money and our central bank is that good and (it is among the oldest central banks in Asia), how can you explain the fact that in Asean, with the possible exception of Indonesia, the Philippines has the highest inflation rate, the highest interest rates, the highest unemployment, the highest poverty incidence, and the lowest foreign investment inflow and the lowest ranking in Asean in Human Development Index or a measure of people’s well-being.

How come out of 1,500 towns, 600 towns  do not have a bank branch?  How come more than 60 million Filipinos do not have a bank account?

Amid so much liquidity (the techspeak for so much cash), how come 25 million Filipinos wallow in abject poverty?

Why, indeed?


[email protected]

Topics: Tony Lopez , President Rodrigo Duterte , Cambodia , Hong Kong , China , Russia
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementSpeaker GMA