Labor Secretary Silvestre Bello III on Monday, May 28, said the Department of Labor and Employment will study a possible increase in the minimum wage, amid increasing prices of goods. Bello said he had instructed wage boards to closely monitor the increasing prices of basic commodities, which is partly attributed to the newly implemented tax reform law. If this situation persists, labor officials said a minimum wage increase across the country could be implemented by August or September this year. Bello added that cash subsidies of P100 to P200 a month for Filipino minimum wage earners are also being studied by the department.
The Makabayan bloc in the House of Representatives also filed a bill seeking a P750 daily national minimum wage for workers on Monday, which would also abolish wage boards. Bong Labog of Kilusang Mayo Uno said the measure would provide “immediate relief” from high commodity prices.
Raising the minimum wage, however, is a formula for causing unemployment among the least-skilled members of society. The higher wages are, the higher costs of production are. The higher costs of production are, the higher prices are. The higher prices are, the smaller are the quantities of goods and services demanded and the number of workers employed in producing them. These are all propositions of elementary economics that all educated citizens and political leaders should well know.
It is true that the wages of the workers who keep their jobs will be higher. They will enjoy the benefit of a government-created monopoly that excludes from the market the competition of those unemployed workers who are willing and able to work for less than what the monopolists receive.
The payment of the monopolists’ higher wages will come at the expense of reduced expenditures for labor and capital goods elsewhere in the economic system, which must result in more unemployment.
Those who are unemployed elsewhere and who are relatively more skilled will displace workers of lesser skill, with the ultimate result of still more unemployment among the least-skilled members of society.
The unemployment directly and indirectly caused by raising the minimum wage will require additional government welfare spending and thus higher taxes and/or greater budget deficits to finance it.
The policy is fundamentally anti-labor and anti-poor people. While it enriches those poor people who are given the status of government-protected monopolists, it impoverishes the rest of the economic system to a greater degree. It does this through the combination both of taking away an amount of wealth equal to the monopolists’ gains, and of causing overall production to be less by an amount corresponding to the additional unemployment it creates. The rise in prices and taxes that results from raising the minimum wage both diminishes the gains of the monopolists and serves to create new and additional poor people, while worsening the poverty of those who become unemployed.
Furthermore, the higher the minimum wage is raised, the worse are the effects on poor people. This is because, on the one hand, the resulting overall unemployment is greater, while, on the other hand, the protection a lower wage provides against competition from higher-paid workers is more and more eroded. At today’s minimum wage of P512 per day for non-agricultural jobs in the National Capital Region, for example, workers earning that wage are secure against the competition of workers able to earn P600 or P700 per day. If the minimum wage is increased to P750 per day, and the jobs that presently pay P512 had to pay P750, then workers who previously would not have considered those jobs because of their ability to earn P600 or P700 per day will now consider them; many of them will have to consider them, because they will be unemployed. The effect is to expose the workers whose skills do not exceed a level corresponding to P512 per day to the competition of better educated, more skilled workers presently able to earn wage rates ranging from just above P512 to just below P750 per day. The further effect could be that there will simply no longer be room in the economic system for the employment of minimally educated, low-skilled people.
Of course, the minimum wage has been increased repeatedly over the years since it was first introduced, and there has continued to be at least some significant room for the employment of such workers. What has made this possible is the long periods in which the minimum wage was not increased. Continuous inflation of the money supply and the rise in the volume of spending and thus in wage rates and prices throughout the economic system progressively reduce the extent to which the minimum wage exceeds the wage that would prevail in its absence. The minimum wages of long ago became nullities. To reduce and ultimately eliminate the harm done by today’s minimum wage, it needs to be left unchanged.
The standard of living is not raised by arbitrary laws and decrees imposing higher wage rates, but by the rise in the productivity of labor, which increases the supply of goods relative to the supply of labor and thus reduces prices relative to wage rates, and thereby allows prices to rise by less than wages when the quantity of money and volume of spending in the economic system increase.
If raising the standard of living of the average worker is the goal, we should abandon efforts to raise the minimum wage. Instead, we should strive to eliminate all government policies that restrain the rise in the productivity of labor and thus in the buying power of wages.
The principle here is that we need to look to greater economic freedom, not greater government intervention, as the path to economic improvement for everyone, especially the poor.