spot_img
28.4 C
Philippines
Thursday, April 25, 2024

DOJ orders dismissal of Annabelle Rama’s cyber libel case vs. Jayke Joson

- Advertisement -

THE Department of Justice (DOJ) headed by Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla has ordered the dismissal of the cyber libel charges filed against former actor-producer Jayke Joson before the Quezon City Prosecutors Office by talent manager Annabelle Rama-Gutierrez for lack of probable cause.

In a resolution signed by Secretary Remulla and promulgated last February 22, the DOJ ruled that prosecutors “erred in finding probable cause” against businessman Joson and the resolution dated March 21, 2022 of the Office of the City Prosecutor of QC “is hereby reversed and set aside.”

Jayke Joson

“The complaint against Respondent-Appellant [Joson] is hereby dismissed for lack of probable cause,” the DOJ resolution stated.

Joson, for his part, welcomed the resolution.

The DOJ also ordered the QC prosecutors to withdraw the corresponding information filed before the QC Regional Trial Court Branch 90 and to report its action taken within ten days of its receipt of the resolution.

- Advertisement -

Last December 2, 2022, the DOJ also ordered the Las Pinas City Prosecutor’s Office to junk Joson’s cyber libel case filed against Rama, similarly for lack of probable cause.

“[Joson] did not act with malice in issuing said remarks against [Rama],” the DOJ also stated in its resolution directing the QC prosecutor. “Considering the element of malice is not present, the instant case must be dismissed for lack of probable cause.”

The case stemmed from the complaint by the talent manager Rama against Joson after back-and-forth bickering between their camps on social media and online news reports.

Joson responded with a counter-affidavit denying having a hand in the publication of such reports. He also cited Rama’s status as a public figure, making his remarks against her “form part of privilege communication.”

In its resolution, the DOJ said Joson’s remarks were not defamatory, and that Joson was able to present documentary proof to back the statements he issued against Rama.

“The remarks of the Respondent-Appellant [Joson] were not defamatory. On the contrary, Joson was able to present the documentary proof on which he based his statements upon,” the resolution stated.

It also said Joson’s revelations of Rama’s pending cases — one of the points raised by Rama in her complaint — was previously reported by several online news outlets.

Joson, according to the resolution, did not act with malice in issuing said remarks against the former actress and talent manager.

- Advertisement -

LATEST NEWS

Popular Articles