Duterte turns off foreign fund managers

posted August 24, 2018 at 12:30 am
by  Eric Jurado
I came across a disturbing article in the Financial Times last Thursday, about foreign fund managers turning their backs on the Philippines because of President Duterte. The following are selected excerpts from that article:

Fund managers have slashed their exposure to the Philippines by more than half in the past three years as the former emerging market darling dramatically fell out of favor.

In mid-2015, EM (emerging markets) equity funds typically had a 2 percent weighting to the Manila exchange, an overweight position of about 0.7 percentage points vis-à-vis the benchmark MSCI index. However near constant selling since then has brought the average fund weight down to 0.87 per cent, the lowest level since 2011 and below the Philippines’ benchmark weight, based on analysis of the holdings of 180 EM equity funds with combined assets of $355 billion conducted by Copley Fund Research.

The retreat has been broad based, with 83 percent of funds cutting their exposure to the Philippines over the past year, according to Steven Holden, founder of Copley.

Only 58 per cent of funds now have any holdings at all in the Philippines, the lowest level since early 2012, with vehicles run by the likes of BlackRock, Fidelity, Ashmore, Carmignac, and Pictet exiting the country in the past year.

Even the manager of one of the funds that still has an outsize exposure to Manila told the Financial Times: “To be honest, it’s not because I find the Philippines all that attractive right now. I am actively seeking substitutes.”

While stock-specific factors play a role in the exodus, fund managers cite concern over the macroeconomic backdrop in the Philippines, amid a perception that the central bank has fallen behind the curve in tightening monetary policy.

Economic growth has been a robust 6 percent or above since 2015. As a result, inflation has spiraled to a nine-year high of 5.7 percent and the current account, which has traditionally been in surplus to the tune of 3-4 percent of gross domestic product a year, slipped to a deficit of 0.8 of GDP in 2017.

Despite this, the central bank cut interest rates from 4 percent to 3 percent in 2016 and only returned them to the 4 percent level this month.

With rates still low by historical standards, the peso has fallen 6.7 percent against an ascendant dollar this year to a 12-year nominal low of 53.5 pesos per dollar, adding to losses for foreign investors who have already had to grapple with a 10.8 percent year-to-date slide in the Philippine Stock Exchange Composite index in local currency terms.

“There has been a decision over the last couple of years to let our weighting slide lower. We were quite overweight,” said Douglas Reed, global strategist and economist on the emerging and Asian equity team at Newton Investment Management, whose Emerging Income Fund has closed its 2.1 percent position in the Philippines in the past six months, according to Copley’s data, while its sister Global Emerging Markets Fund has cut its holdings by 2.7 percentage points.

“The Philippines is one of the fastest-growing emerging market economies but we had become a little more concerned that the economy was perhaps growing a little bit faster than it should be,” Mr. Reed said.

“The central bank has decided to take a lackadaisical approach to inflation targeting. It’s only this year that they have stood up and come out with rate increases, therefore we’re slightly more bearish on the currency over the next six months versus the average EM currency. We would like to see the central bank get ahead of the curve.”

Andrew Jones, portfolio manager and head of equity research at PineBridge Investments, whose Global Emerging Markets Focus Equity Fund has also cut its exposure, said: “Going into this [period], a lot of fund managers were pretty long [bullish on] the Philippines. It’s a secular growth opportunity, GDP [growth] is in the 6 percent range and is likely to stay there.”

He added: “But CPI [inflation] has been creeping up a lot. There is uncertainty on the trade side and the dollar. Most investors want to see a higher interest rate in the Philippines right now. The central bank is not as responsive as we would like.”

Mr. Reed also cited concerns over the policies of Rodrigo Duterte, the Philippines’ strongman president, whose war on drugs has led to the deaths of an estimated 12,000 people since he took office in 2016 and who has also taken a tough line with Islamist militants on the southern island of Mindanao.

“His economic policies have been good and we have been impressed with those,” said Mr. Reed, “but it’s the unknown unknowns, it’s these kinds of things that can suddenly become a market focus.”

“We like the fundamentals, we just want to get a little more comfort on the macro side before investing more,” Mr. Jones said. Others remain more upbeat still on the Philippines.”

Scott Klimo, chief investment officer of Washington state-based investment house Saturna Capital, said: “The demographics are probably the best in Asia, it certainly has the youngest population. The English spoken there tends to be pretty decent so you do see BPO [business process outsourcing] opportunities there and Filipinos are happy to go abroad and work and send back remittances.”

Saturna’s Amana Developing World Fund has a 7.8 percent position in the Philippines, the highest of the 180 funds in Copley’s database. Its third-largest holding is SM Prime Holdings, the country’s largest shopping mall and retail operator; it also has stakes in Aboitiz Power and Manila Electric Co. (Meralco).

As for the economic issues, Mr. Klimo said they were pretty much the norm in developing economies, while some metrics were improving, such as government debt, which has steadily fallen from 43.9 percent of GDP in 2009 to 28.3 percent last year.

He also suggested that part of the depreciation of the peso had less to do with the economics than the fact that Mr. Duterte “is a disaster” and some people “don’t want to be associated with him.”

Noting that, as long-term, values-based investors (the fund is sharia compliant), it had built up its holdings under Benigno Aquino III, Mr. Duterte’s predecessor, Mr. Klimo said: “We have no illusions about the murderous thug who is the current president.” Harsh words indeed from the fund that is the country’s biggest fan.

[email protected]

Topics: Eric Jurado , President Rodrigo Duterte , Financial Times , Economic growth
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by The Standard. Comments are views by thestandard.ph readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of thestandard.ph. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with The Standard editorial standards, The Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.