Iloilo RTC grants MORE petition

Panay Electric Co. could lose the rest of its properties to rival MORE Electric and Power Corp. after the Iloilo Regional Trial Court Branch 24 granted the latter’s petition in the ongoing expropriation case over power distribution assets in Iloilo City.

In a 22-page decision issued on Sept 24, 2020, RTC Judge Nestle Go granted MORE Power’s motion to include the so-called Category C assets in the writ of possession (WOP) earlier issued by RTC Judge Emerald Requina-Contreras in February 2020.

The WOP was an offshoot of the expropriation case that MORE Power filed against PECO on March 11, 2019, almost a month after the former secured its congressional franchise to distribute power in Iloilo City via Republic Act 11212.

Judge Contreras’ WOP divided the PECO properties into three categories:

• Category A includes all properties that PECO did not contest as “distribution assets”

• Category B includes the properties the court initially found as part of the “distribution assets” listed under the “distribution plant” in the Energy Regulatory Commission record and may be necessary for the operation of MORE Power

• Category C lists the properties excluded in the coverage of the writ.

The WOP covers the properties under categories A and B, which include the La Paz, City Proper, Jaro, Molo, and Mandurriao substations; and the Meter Lab, Power Plant Building, and Switchboard House located in General Luna Street.

The Category C assets include:

• PECO’s business building office, elevator and parking lot on General Luna Street, City Proper;

• a 769-square meter lot at General Hughes, City Proper;

• a 2,401-square meter lot used as pole stockyard at Diversion Road, San Rafael, Mandurriao;

-two guest/staff houses and semi concrete canteen at General Luna Street, City Proper

In his decision, Judge Go found PECO’s assertion that only assets connected to the distribution system must be covered by the WOP and turned over to MORE Power as “without merit.”

The judge said the Category C properties were “necessary for the maintenance and operation of the distribution systems,” thus “the issuance of a writ of possession over the same is in order.”

Go also found as devoid of merit PECO’s contention that “a full-blown trial should be conducted before an order of expropriation be issued.”

“There is no need for a full-blown trial before the court can issue an order of expropriation. The propriety of the complaint and the compliance with the deposit required by law are the determining factors before an order of expropriation can be issued. Since the Honorable Court had already issued a writ of possession with respect to the properties enumerated as Category A and B Assets, an order of expropriation is proper. However, with respect to Category C Assets, plaintiff MORE is still not in possession of the same, thus an Order of Expropriation pertaining to all these properties is held in abeyance.”

Allana Mae Babayen-on, legal officer of MORE Power, said the Category C assets were vital to MORE Power’s operations especially that they plan to put up more substations in the city.

MORE Power can also use the business building to cater to consumers.

Babayen-on said they would wait for the sheriff to turn over the Category C assets to MORE Power, just like what happened when they took over the substations early this year.

Topics: Panay Electric Co. , MORE Electric and Power Corp. , Nestle Go
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementGMA-Working Pillars of the House