Advertisement

Laundering scandal exposes weak system

THE scandal over the laundering of $81 million stolen by hackers through the local banking system has exposed the Philippines as a dirty money haven.

The funds, stolen from the Bangladesh central bank’s American accounts, were immediately sent via electronic transfer to the Rizal Commercial Banking Corp., with the thieves deliberately targeting their laundering location.

The Philippines has some of the world’s strictest bank secrecy laws to protect account holders, while its casinos are exempt from rules altogether aimed at preventing money laundering.  

“The Philippines is very attractive [for dirty money] because our laws have gaping holes. It’s easy to launder money here,” said Senator Sergio Osmena III, who is pushing for stronger anti-money laundering laws.

Senator Sergio Osmena III
Still, if the thieves were to get away with their audacious heist, the money had to be moved quickly through the banking system and into the casinos.

And it did.

Authorities took four days to order a recall of the money.

But by then it had vanished—leaving in its place a tale of death threats, bribes, shady business figures and a bank manager who could be the villain or a victim.

“I did not do anything wrong. If this is a nightmare, I want to wake up now,” the manager of RCBC bank, Maia Deguito, told ABS-CBN television this week after authorities stopped her at Manila airport from trying to leave the country.

“I live everyday in fear.”

With authorities in Bangladesh and elsewhere bamboozled over who masterminded the cyber-heist, Deguito’s role as manager of the bank that accepted and shifted the money has come under intense scrutiny.

She has accused the bank’s president, Lorenzo Tan, of ordering her to move the money. He has fiercely denied the accusations.

Senators who launched an inquiry this week into the affair are yet to determine whether she was a scapegoat or not, but are convinced she was not the mastermind.

“It’s a big operation. This could not have been done out of the Philippines alone,” Senator Ralph Recto said.

The Senate inquiry and another probe by the Anti-Money Laundering Council have hit several major hurdles, including a security camera at the bank not working when the money was shifted.

Accusations and counter-accusations between Deguito and RCBC management have further confused investigators.

A final roadblock has emerged at the casinos, with the money apparently vanishing in mountains of gambling chips and mysterious middlemen.

“Our money trail ended at the casinos,” Julia Abad, deputy director of the anti-money laundering council, told senators Tuesday.

On Feb. 5, the same day Bangladesh Bank was hacked, the money was sent electronically to four accounts in Deguito’s RCBC Jupiter branch in Makati, according to testimony to the Senate inquiry.

Those accounts appeared to have been set up solely for that purpose because they were done using aliases, the Senate inquiry heard.

After that, the bulk of the money was transferred into accounts of a local ethnic Chinese businessmen, William Go, who has since protested his innocence. He said his signature was forged to set up the accounts.

From there, the money was briefly held by Philrem, a foreign exchange brokerage.

Philrem president Salud Bautista told the Senate inquiry $30 million went to a man named Weikang Xu. 

He was described as a casino junket operator but senators have said they know little more about him other than he is of Chinese origin.

The Anti-Money Laundering Council said another $29 million ended up in Solaire, a casino on a glittering Manila bayside strip that the Philippines hopes will become one of the world’s biggest gambling destinations.

That money was exchanged into chips but could only be turned back into cash after being played in the casino, its management told the Senate inquiry.

Another $21 million was sent to Eastern Hawaii Leisure, which runs a sparsely furnished casino with Chinese-only television in Santa Ana, a sleepy town in the far northern Philippines, according to the council.

Osmeña said the case was likely just the tip of the iceberg.

“This could have happened hundreds of times already,” he said.

“We discovered this one only because someone complained. But normally, if a drug dealer from Burma [Myanmar] or China would send money here, no one would complain,” he said.

Presidential candidate Davao City Mayor Rodrigo Duterte has called for a review of the Anti-Money Laundering Act following the RCBC scandal.

“AMLA is a good law, but we need to see to it that the law is implemented the way it is supposed to be,” said Duterte. “What is important is for us to find the loopholes and the weak points of the regulations.” 

Topics: Laundering scandal , weak system , Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. , Anti-Money Laundering Council
COMMENT DISCLAIMER: Reader comments posted on this Web site are not in any way endorsed by Manila Standard. Comments are views by manilastandard.net readers who exercise their right to free expression and they do not necessarily represent or reflect the position or viewpoint of manilastandard.net. While reserving this publication’s right to delete comments that are deemed offensive, indecent or inconsistent with Manila Standard editorial standards, Manila Standard may not be held liable for any false information posted by readers in this comments section.
AdvertisementKPPI
Advertisement